Rising Prices Make Homeownership Affordability More Unequal Across the U.S. | Real Estate Insider News – Real Estate Coaching and Training

The Trulia Price Monitor and the Trulia Rent Monitor are the earliest leading indicators of how asking prices and rents are trending nationally and locally. They adjust for the changing mix of listed homes and therefore show what’s really happening to asking prices and rents. Because asking prices lead sales prices by approximately two or more months, the Monitors reveal trends before other price indexes do. With that, here’s the scoop on where prices and rents are headed.

Urgent Help Wanted: New report exposes the cold hard fact that 44% of all homeowners are STILL underwater. New REO Surge expected soon.  Exclusive FREE REO/ BPO TRAINING for agents who are ready to learn how to list bank owned homes. Watch FREE Training Video now and Download FREE Training Guide. NOTE: First 700 Agents only.

Prices Up 9.5% Year-over-Year, and Rising in 98 of 100 Largest Metros

In May, asking home prices rose 1.1% month-over-month, seasonally adjusted. That’s slower than in previous months — asking prices rose 1.4% in each of February, March, and April (includes revisions) – but still at a very fast clip. Quarter-over-quarter, prices are up 4.0%, seasonally adjusted. Year-over-year, prices are up 9.5% nationally and are higher than one year ago in 98 of the 100 largest metros.

May 2013 Trulia Price Monitor Summary

% change in asking prices

# of 100 largest metros with asking-price increases

% change in asking prices, excluding foreclosures

Month-over-month,
seasonally adjusted

1.1%

Not reported

1.4%

Quarter-over-quarter,
seasonally adjusted

4.0%

94

4.5%

Year-over-year

9.5%

98

10.5%

 

Prices Rising Sharply in the Least Affordable Markets

Recent price gains are squeezing would-be buyers in metros where the cost of owning is steep. We created a measure of local affordability based on current asking prices and the most recent wage data available (from the 2012 third-quarter Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages survey). We estimated how far a typical worker’s wages to go pay the mortgage on a standard-sized home (1800 square feet) at current mortgage rates (3.8%), using local wages and local asking prices. (Keep in mind that wages are not the only source of income, and some households have more than one wage-earner while others have none. That means the actual cost-of-housing burden for a particular household may be higher or lower, but our method is designed compare affordability across metros in an apples-to-apples way.) The monthly mortgage payment relative to the typical worker’s wages ranges hugely, from a high of 74% in Honolulu and 55% in San Francisco to just 8% in Detroit and 12% in Houston and Atlanta.

Among the 10 least affordable metros, eight had double-digit price gains in the past year. Three had price gains of more than 20%: Orange County, Oakland, and San Jose. Among the 10 least affordable metros, the average Y-o-Y asking price gain was 16.3%.

Price Changes in the 10 Least Affordable Housing Markets *

U.S. Metro

% of monthly average wage needed to pay mortgage*

Y-o-Y% change in prices

Honolulu, HI

74%

12.8%

San Francisco, CA

55%

19.6%

Orange County, CA

44%

21.2%

Ventura County, CA

41%

15.4%

Los Angeles, CA

41%

17.4%

San Diego, CA

37%

16.8%

Oakland, CA

37%

31.2%

Long Island, NY

35%

1.1%

New York, NY-NJ

35%

4.6%

San Jose, CA

33%

23.2%

Among 100 largest metros. Affordability is measured as the mortgage payment (3.8% 30-year fixed) on a 1,800-square-foot home at the local median asking price per foot divided by the local average monthly wage for a worker.

In contrast, among the 10 most affordable metros, prices rose 9.5% on average – same as the national price increase, but well behind the average price gain for the 10 least affordable metros. The affordable metros of Detroit, Atlanta, Memphis, Fort Worth, and Dallas all had double-digit price gains, but the rest of the most affordable metros had price gains below the national rate.

Price Changes in the 10 Most Affordable Housing Markets*

# U.S. Metro

% of monthly average wage needed to pay mortgage *

Y-o-Y% change in prices

1 Detroit, MI

8%

17.1%

2 Houston, TX

12%

8.7%

3 Atlanta, GA

12%

13.5%

4 Memphis, TN-MS-AR

13%

10.6%

5 Indianapolis, IN

14%

7.0%

6 Dayton, OH

14%

3.2%

7 Fort Worth, TX

14%

12.4%

8 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN

14%

5.1%

9 Cleveland, OH

14%

6.8%

10 Dallas, TX

14%

11.1%

Among 100 largest metros. Affordability is measured as the mortgage payment (3.8% 30-year fixed) on an 1,800-square-foot home at the local median asking price per foot divided by the local average monthly wage for a worker.

The Widening Affordability Gap – and Why it Matters

Across all 100 metros, less affordable markets tend to have high price gains. The correlation between the Y-o-Y price gain and the mortgage-payment-versus-wage measure is 0.3 (statistically significant at the 5% level). That means that homeownership affordability is becoming more unequal across the U.S. – the gap between more affordable and less affordable markets is growing. This growing gap means two things for the housing market:

First, as local markets become more unequal, more people will consider moving from less affordable to more affordable areas. The example of California makes this clear: in the years when California home prices were even more out of line with the rest of the U.S., more people left California for other states. Therefore, widening affordability gaps could cause more people to make long-distance moves to a more affordable local housing market.

Second, a widening affordability gap puts pressure on housing policy. It’s harder to come up with one-size-fits-all national housing policies when local markets are becoming more different from each other. For instance, more expensive markets tend to benefit more from the mortgage interest deduction – so as prices become more unequal, it means that the impact of any changes to the mortgage interest deduction would be even more concentrated in some geographic areas.

Rents Rising More Slowly in More Affordable Markets

Rents are up 2.3% year-over-year nationally. Rents are rising faster than prices in just 2 of the 25 largest rental markets: Houston and Philadelphia. Among the five least affordable rental markets, rents are rising strongly in Miami and Boston, steadily in New York, but only modestly in San Francisco and Los Angeles. In contrast, in three of the most affordable big-city rental markets – Seattle, Las Vegas, and Sacramento — rents were flat or falling.

Rent Changes and Rental Affordability

# U.S. Metro

% of monthly average wage needed to pay rent*

Y-o-Y % change in rents

1 New York, NY-NJ

58%

3.7%

2 Miami, FL

57%

6.4%

3 Los Angeles, CA

46%

1.8%

4 San Francisco, CA

46%

0.2%

5 Boston, MA

44%

5.5%

6 San Diego, CA

41%

5.1%

7 Orange County, CA

41%

3.4%

8 Oakland, CA

41%

1.3%

9 RiversideSan Bernardino, CA

40%

1.1%

10 Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV

39%

2.0%

11 Chicago, IL

37%

5.0%

12 Baltimore, MD

33%

0.1%

13 Philadelphia, PA

32%

4.5%

14 Houston, TX

29%

9.7%

15 Denver, CO

29%

4.2%

16 Dallas, TX

29%

1.9%

17 TampaSt. Petersburg, FL

28%

5.4%

18 MinneapolisSt. Paul, MN-WI

28%

1.3%

19 Portland, OR-WA

27%

4.2%

20 Atlanta, GA

27%

1.9%

21 Seattle, WA

26%

0.4%

22 Las Vegas, NV

26%

-0.9%

23 Phoenix, AZ

24%

1.7%

24 Sacramento, CA

23%

0.0%

25 St. Louis, MO-IL

22%

2.2%

Among 25 largest rental markets. Affordability is measured as the local median rent for a 2-bedroom unit divided by the local average monthly wage for a worker.

 The next Trulia Price Monitor and Trulia Rent Monitor will be released on Wednesday, July 3, at 10 AM ET.

How did we put this report together? To recap the methodology, the Trulia Price Monitor and the Trulia Rent Monitor track asking home prices and rents on a monthly basis, adjusting for the changing composition of listed homes, including foreclosures provided by RealtyTrac. The Trulia Price Monitor also accounts for the regular seasonal fluctuations in asking prices in order to reveal the underlying trend in prices. The Monitors can detect price movements at least three months before the major sales-price indexes do. Our FAQs provide all the technical details.